According to the established case law of this Court (from Cass. 4544/2010 and 13767/2010 to Cass. 13117/2011), the interpretation of the decision-making time with regard to the extension renders the observance of the 48 hours completely irrelevant, since, once the request is received, it is the duty of the Justice of the Peace to set the hearing with adversarial proceedings (as imposed interpretatively by this Court with decision 4544/2010) in such a way that the positive decision is made before the expiration of the deadline initially set with the validation (or with the previous extension).
Project funded by the European Union's Citizens,